Why I Decided to Expose Zoosadists
When I become interested in something, I begin to seek out information on that subject. I begin to find people who are more knowledgeable than me, with more extensive experience in that area to help expand my own understanding of whatever that thing is. This kind of research, in the age of the Internet, has never been simpler. As an example, I recently took an interest in the food industry and the implications of consuming ultra processed foods and sugar. I found an abundance of books, podcasts and TED talks, content produced by academics and investigative documentaries. There is simply no shortage of information and every day I’m able to find something new.
To celebrate over 2,000 New Way Twitter community members, we’re releasing this magazine for free. Thank you so much for all of the support!
Support Aryan businesses by downloading Arditi Issue No. II: “Be what you are”. Featuring 7 new articles and 5 illustrations, this magazine is packed with the blood, sweat, and tears of our Aryan brothers and sisters. If you would like to download a digital copy which includes over 60 pages of content, click the link down below.
If you want to know more about something, you only have to ask. When we think back to the late eighties, a lot of the excitement surrounding the Internet was the prospect of an age in which unrestricted information would free us. I suppose they had no way of predicting TikTok and what the future would actually look like.
All of this, however, does not apply to the subject of zoosadism. Simply put, there is an information void and a total absence of academic input in this area.
In this article I will venture into why I do not think this necessarily matters and why a shift away from ‘understanding’ may be a positive thing, when it comes to this subject.
From this point onwards I will be talking frankly about the behaviours of people who derive pleasure from the suffering of animals.
Academia Empathizes Animal Abusers.
The concept of sexual pleasure derived from the abuse of animals is far from novel, Clifford Allen had “The Sexual Perversions and Abnormalities: A Study in the Psychology of Paraphilia”republished in 1979 and used the term bestialsadism to describe this disturbing phenomena. Good luck finding an updated copy of this study. Zoosadism has always been an overlooked side note to the much more widely studied bestiality. Where it is touched upon as a subject, it’s a smaller subsection to a much wider study into other areas. The domain of fringe outcasts among outliers.
Hani Miletski’s “Understanding Bestiality and Zoophilia” features conversations with Zoosadists, however the books primary focus is bestiality. Miletski has gone on to become a sort of darling to those who advocate for having sex with animals, anyone who is anyone in that world has likely had a conversation with her at some point. Miletski’s approach to ‘understanding’ seems to expand to wanting to cultivate empathy;
“I was intrigued with the idea that there are people who may be sexually attracted to animals.”
I would not use the word ‘intrigue’ to describe what feelings these people inspire in me. And whilst I cannot substantiate this gut feeling with data, I dispute that these people are ‘attracted’ to animals. I am of the belief that zoosadism and zoophilia are both questions of fulfilling a power dynamic. The animal is a means to this very particular end.
At best human relationships are complicated and require communication and compromise, whereas a relationship between a human and animal is a question of domestication and training. Ultimately, control. This control is at the heart of the zoosadists paraphilia.
I recall one primate zoosadist talking about the excitement he felt upon seeing an infant macaques fearful response as the VO approached its cage. He enjoyed the idea this fear had been deliberately instilled and he described it as ‘power’, which he himself wanted to experience. I was bemused by this, the absurdity of deriving a sense of control from a video of a pervert over on the other side of the globe abusing small animals. There is no reasonable explanation for it, no unravelling you could do that would have you conclude; “now I understand.”
Better to simply drag them out into daylight.
One of the major issues with Miletski’s academic and understanding oriented approach is that zoosadists lie. Admittedly, Miletski does acknowledge this fact at a later stage in her book.
They may be lying when they say they feel remorse after the act. On the other hand, they may wish to present themselves as scary and evil and lie that they feel absolutely no remorse. This is very common among primate zoosadists, who free of any sense of consequence and accountability, revel in the idea of portraying themselves as evil sadists. Taking whatever they say at face value is possible, but has the potential to be greatly misleading. I have no doubt this behaviour applies to zoophiles too. Conversations with these people will more often than not be self serving, they will imagine events as they’d like them to be.
In my own experience, when pressed and cornered beyond further discussion, the zoosadist always defaults to the same point; “well, you tell me why am I this way.”
We are expecting answers from people who themselves don’t quite understand what they are doing, lacking any substantial reasoning for their behaviour, motivated primarily by the fact it is a source of pleasure. The funny thing with Miletski’s approach is that she is likely seeking to work out what motivates these people and why they do what they do, whilst they are using her to a similar end, seeking the validation of an academic in the process.
I believe any serious investigation into this subject should carry a level of moral responsibility and a simple baseline which is not deviated from: zoosadism and zoophilia are fundamentally wrong. Miletski fell short of the mark here.
Fuck Academic Understanding.
At this point, I am less interested in understanding than I am exposure. We do not owe these degenerates understanding. It would be far more constructive to put faces to the Telegram handles of zoosadists, to create systems which are able to pressure the authorities into paying attention. The zoosadists activity, until very recent years, took place in the shadows. It now occupies a mainstream space, in which platforms like YouTube and Facebook can be utilized for distribution and commissioning. This refers most specifically to primate zoosadism, however cat zoosadists have also made use of mainstream platforms. The indifference of the Chinese Communist Party which views anything implying animal rights as bourgeois has allowed cat torture content to flourish.
I want to talk about what these people do, who they are, the places where they gather, and work to erode any sense of security they may have. This is an uphill struggle and a slow process, for the most part zoosadists will continue to do what they do until they are stopped.
Exposure should encompass their behaviours and compulsions, their real world identities, how they do business. I would like to talk about some prominent zoosadists whose story has only been half told by mainstream news outlets and how they operated.
For primate zoosadists, a common approach to securing content is approaching hunting channels on YouTube, or the Facebook accounts of more noticeably negligent primate owners in Indonesia. Google offers a translation service which will allow the zoosadist to request ‘custom videos’, euphemistically describing what they have in mind. Occasionally the potential VO will agree to create animal torture porn for the zoosadist in exchange for money. Perhaps even more rarely, the potential VO goes on to become an active member of the community, joining Telegram groups and interacting with his audience.
Floridaman, Romy Sasmita, Lee Chin Wee, Webster, Ibra ‘Isaac’ Vion, Fiqri Sebastian and Asep Nurul are a few examples of prominent VO’s. Some of whom have been identified, some have been imprisoned, whilst others continue to create content. The prospect of releasing these names and publicising them would have been unthinkable a year ago. I believe the patience we have exercised has taken us so far, but the conversation is now ready to be opened beyond our closed circle. These are all names I intend to delve into over the coming weeks.
With the exception of some earlier crush videos, all major VO’s have been male. Commissioners can be either male or female, with Stacey Storey perhaps being one of the most infamous. Her relationship with Asep Nurul represented an escalation that would set the tone for what was to come. In particular, torture based around sodomy. When Stacey Storey was exposed and investigated by the BBC, other names came to the forefront. A couple are still active participants in chat groups.
Indonesian VO, Fiqri Sebastian, is probably one of the best examples of how easily these people elude justice. This summer, three men were arrested for paying Sebastian to engage in the abuse, sexual torture, mutilation and killing of infant macaques. By my count, Sebastian created no less than twenty videos. Being seventeen throughout the course of his time as a VO, his commissioners have found themselves facing charges relating to child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
Despite alarms and red flags raised around Sebastian repeatedly since his being identified, he maintains a public persona, continues to work with animals and appears to be content that Indonesia is not interested in holding him to account or pursuing any kind of justice. I hope I am winning others over to the idea that studying these people is less important than making them known, at this stage at least.
The story behind Sebastian’s exposure is probably better saved for another article, but thanks for distinct marks on his hand and a lack of discretion on social media, it did not take long to work out who was behind the so called ‘torture dungeon’ videos.
What Happened to the Buyers?
What of the men who sent money to Fiqri Sebastian, his fanbase, his paypigs and instructors. At the top of the pile we have the three who actually found themselves on the receiving end of consequences; Nicholas Dryden, Giancarlo Morelli and a Des Moines, Iowa-based lawyer, Phillip Colt Moss. Let us take a look at them.
Nicholas Dryden, a SoundCloud rapper with a history of criminality, face tattoos and a distinctly recognisable drawling voice. Dryden went by ‘Niko Bellic’ on Telegram, for a brief period he adopted the alias ‘Allah Osama’. The story goes that he pretended to be a Muslim in order to win the trust of Fiqri Sebastian. It appears he was uncomfortable with the moral implications of dismembering live infant macaques for a non-believer.
The line between the horrifying and absurd is frequently blurred, and this is especially so when it comes to Nick Dryden.
Alongside paying minors in Indonesia to torture animals, Dryden rapped under the name ‘Yung Snow’. In his music he describes his relationship with his Son and the failings of his own Mother.
In Letter To My Son he states;
“My sons my spitting image, the only thing that keeps me living.”
It appears Dryden’s compulsion towards sexually charged animal cruelty took priority over his relationship with his child and eventually took him to prison.
Dryden burst into the world of primate zoosadism in 2022 and found himself identified and exposed some months later. His ‘dox’ was legendary, but did nothing to curb his aspirations of directing and funding an animal torture porn venture.
Taking to social media, Dryden eventually happened upon the then seventeen year old Fiqri Sebastian. The promise of money and a little encouragement was all it took to get the content rolling in. After a little coaching and directing, Dryden was sharing teasers and trailers with his increasing fanbase. His fellow zoosadists found themselves in a difficult position, one one hand they knew Dryden was a mouth breathing liability, on the other, he was able to provide them with new material. He soon established himself a following on this basis.
Among his loyal fans was a woman called Kendall Sessions, who was kind enough to create a video to make her enthusiasm towards zoosadism known to the world.
Despite her brazen and open approach to animal torture, she has not faced any legal consequences for her involvement with Dryden. She continues to be active and maintains a close friendship with a currently unidentified UK based producer who keeps a high profile on Telegram and responds to any outside attention with smug delight.
Dryden’s biggest donor was Giancarlo Morelli, who dispensed with thousands of dollars in order to see his very particular fetishes fulfilled by Fiqri Sebastian. Morelli had an interest in diapers, and urged Dryden to make sure Sebastian dressed the infant macaques in tight diapers. These exchanges found their way into court documents and have since been made available to the public. For some reason, Dryden wanted monkeys dressed in yellow. Their interest in these animals goes beyond the ‘hate’ they claim motivates them, and often manifests in strange and compulsive ways which are indicative of paraphilia.
Dryden found himself arrested for offences entirely unrelated to his zoosadism in April 2023. It was noted that a holder was in place, suggesting other law enforcement organisations wished to speak to Dryden. Likely for things that had nothing to do with his faulty headlights and an assault charge.
The community overlooked this and assured themselves that he had gotten away with it all. If they had anything on Dryden, they’d be charging him then and there. They told themselves; “if Dryden can get away with it, anyone can.” They continued to share his content, and one of his biggest allies, and one of the biggest names in animal torture porn would continue to create new content and operate independent of Dryden after his arrest. Phillip Colt Moss.
Phillip Colt Moss, above, a Des Moines-based lawyer with previous charges for drug possession was a well known figure among primate zoosadists on Telegram. Born to a relatively wealthy background, Colt is alleged to have travelled to create content himself and had no difficulty financing videos from the States. He is confirmed to have embarked on sexual relationships with other zoosadists, whilst being married to another lawyer, Ande Moss.
Ande Moss was made aware of her husbands zoosadist activity, she did not act on this information and appears to continue to support her husband, with recent court documents suggesting she supported his release on bail, taking him back into their home.
Phillip Colt Moss was known for being one of the only commissioners to secure videos of pigtail macaques, a distinct sub species which represented something novel for his inner circle. Being in his Forties, Moss understood the full implications of what he was doing and appeared to be acting not for status or financial gain, but out of a straightforward compulsion to see sexually sadistic animal abuse.
Interestingly, Moss’s charges appear to be all related to his relationship with Dryden, rather than the videos he commissioned himself after Dryden’s arrest. Not long after Dryden’s arrest a video of a man with a ring identical to one Moss wears, in a hotel room (likely in Indonesia) with a baby monkey became available to us. We now hope law enforcement will take the time to discuss Moss’s history of travel with him.
The arrests of Dryden and the VO Romy Sasmita (known by his people as ‘black pearl’) slowed down content production, with a couple of active VO’s putting out content on an intermittent basis. With the exception of a couple of names, as of mid 2024 the financial backbone of primate zoosadism has maintained a level of anonymity, which they will likely enjoy until future in fighting compromises them.
When it comes to understanding, I believe the best measure by which to judge these people is what they do within their own community, rather than what they say when confronted or subject to analysis. I will expand on this idea here.
History Repeats Itself
History has a tendency to repeat itself when it comes to zoosadists. In 2018 a Telegram channel called ‘Zoosadist Evidence’ came hot on the heels of infighting and was launched and publicised by a zoophile called Akela. One of the most active participants in the groups featured in the Zoosadist Evidence leaks was Levi Simmons, who was sentenced in 2020 for child sexual abuse crimes on the back of his zoosadism. We know these people fight one another, we know their paraphilia is often a package deal that is not limited to animal abuse.
We have seen similar situations play out time and time again since. Primate zoosadist infighting is its own subject which should be given its own special focus further down the line, but suffice to say, the passion with which zoosadists can hate one another means a lot of work is done for us, as we simply have to watch and wait patiently for names to be leaked.
We can understand them by how they interact with one another, how they assure one another and open up about their fantasies and capacity for cruelty.
Lets open the lid on some groups and take a look at a few examples of how they interact.
Human Infant Substitutes
For a while, this was an extremely common take. The uncanny valley theory proposed that infant macaques look strikingly like human infants, with slight differences that triggered a negative response. They phased this talking point out as it was noted how strange it was that they wanted to see something they concede resembles a human child being sexually abused and tortured to death.
This is an example of self soothing. Zoosadists will often assure one another that there’s either an underlying reasoning behind what they do, which lies entirely beyond their control. Or that what they do isn’t really that bad, because nature either made them that way or the target of their abuse is somehow deserving of it.
We see the uncanny valley theory invoked less and less, as primate zoosadists are usually desperate to downplay the paedophilic aspects of what they do and certainly don’t want it to be thought that they could pose a risk to children. A disturbing amount of baby monkey torture fetishists have access to children, its almost a recurring theme. This is a concern to us, and we do wish law enforcement shared our sense of urgency when it comes to reacting to known zoosadists having dependents, children and vulnerable people under their watch.
Like human babies. Occasionally the mask slips.
I try to source any quotes like this from smaller groups, and focus on prominent and established community members. Like KT above. If an unknown account says a similar thing, the wider community will engage in plausible deniability and suggest that person is some sort of infiltrator out to give them a bad name. They cannot do that when it comes to well known group members.
Regrettably, some of the most damning quotes and instances of primate zoosadists giving us insight into how they think are found in closed and private groups which cannot be made public, as it would become apparent they have been compromised. However, much like the 2018 Zoosadist Evidence Telegram group, the closed corners of ‘Million Pity’ will too have their day in the light of public.
We will understand them well by their own actions and words. They speak for themselves.
They would have you believe there is no sexual component to what they do, that their paraphilia is concerned solely with the fact they dislike monkeys and wish to see these animals abused. The primate zoosadist is a thin skinned narcissist that wishes to be perceived in a very certain way. If, say, Miletski were to approach a primate zoosadist for an academic study, she’d be told something like ‘baby monkeys inspire a revulsion in me that I cannot control, and I enjoy seeing them subject to harm, there is nothing weird or perverse about this, it is part of my normal, human genetic make up.’
We get a different reality when we take a glance at how they interact among their own people. It is best to accept, when confronted with their own words, they will still engage in denial and self soothing behaviours. They cannot be reasoned out of what they do and do not wish to be. The only realistic approach then, is as previously stated, exposure and accountability.
I stand firmly by the fact these people are dangerous perverts who have formed an elaborate system of self assurance and found free reign to escalate and encourage one another in this escalation. Left unchecked, we are seeing just how quickly and effectively evil and depravity can make use of whatever resources it has as its disposal. Zoosadists are known for lacking a sense of consequence, it can be argued they are dumb by nature and when they act they do so from a place of unthinking compulsion. However, I believe some are satisfied that law enforcement simply hasn’t caught up to what they are doing, and they feel unthreatened as a result.
Remember Giancarlo Morelli, the diaper fetishist who funded Nicholas Dryden’s content production? They’d have you believe he was an anomaly and an outlier, that is is unfair to judge their community by the strange words of one man…
When it comes to understanding, there is how they would like to be understood and how they should be understood. Rather than basing what we know about these people on what they tell us, using prepared statements and learned talking points that cast them in the most favourable light, our best resource is their interactions with one another.
Having access to their groups and private exchanges, interacting with them whilst presenting as one of them have given us unique insight into what motivates these particular zoosadists, and has stripped them of an element of control. And zoosadists abhor the idea of a loss of control, their psychopathy is based around the idea of having total power over something vulnerable and defenceless.
It is not unusual to see terms like ‘Mommy’ and ‘Child’ and the general humanisation of infant macaques in these groups. This quote was taken from a larger, public group so there is scope for plausible deniability. However, it is worth noting that the people who engage in this behaviour are never confronted or challenged, nobody really notices it or acknowledges it unless pressed on the matter from outside, in an article like this.
Lets take a look at one more established community member offering up some revealing takes. In this case, we have Becki Worden (pictured above), who launched an OnlyFans account after getting involved in the sexually sadistic abuse of baby monkeys.
Worden, who goes by Hellon Wheelz on Telegram has this to say;
If asked, the average primate zoosadist would claim to feel nothing but revulsion towards infant macaques, suggesting they find them to be physically repulsive. We frequently see this contradicted by community members who open up about how they perceive the targets for their abusive compulsions as ‘cute’. This is just another example of an inconsistency in how they would like to be understood and how they actually think and feel.
Worden here engages in something called ‘denial of victimhood’. She is saying ‘the target of my perverse, paedophilic compulsions behaves badly, which is why its abuse is justified’. What if a human baby DID behave in a way that she considered to be unfavourable. The above quote is a single instance illustrating why we so urgently do not want these people to have access to dependents. It is worth noting that Worden continues to be active within her community even after being identified, although she has mercifully stopped sharing nude photographs of herself.
In conclusion, I believe we are at a unique advantage in being on the inside of their world. We have rare insight that I consider to be lacking in an academic approach which allows the zoosadist to prepare their platform and decide on narratives in advance, working to control how they are perceived. The challenge on our end then is to maintain proper archives, in which we can look at how frequently certain themes recur, and which behaviours and fantasies are more prominent than others.
We see the idea of ‘discipline’ and the infant macaque being humanised and having human personality traits projected onto it almost constantly. It is impossible to overlook this particularly behaviour. They describe this infant mammal, which much like a human infant, is wired to seek out food and comfort. These behaviours are arguably relatable from a human perspective which strikes me as deeply sinister, in many cases the individuals talking about how the monkeys are ‘greedy, clingy brats’ are Mothers.
By embellishing the abuse with absurd narratives about how deserving of suffering the infant macaque is, the primate zoosadist says more about themselves than they do their preference animal. We understand their fantasies are oriented around something which depends on a career for its survival, that this triggers a sort of sadistic compulsion in their mind. It seems implausible to me that we can safely assume mental illness this overt, depraved and extreme will be restricted to the voyeuristic consumption of animal torture porn. Whilst deriving pleasure from watching is bad enough in itself, there are always other issues at play here.
We raise the alarm on these people and put up red flags. We did so with Tori Wade, of Georgia, Hiawassee. And we were ultimately proved right to do so.
Tori, who is a major and well known figure in the primate zoosadist community was recently arrested, with one of the charges being related to child abuse. She has overseen public chat groups with a member count into the thousands and has a history of distribution and arguably boasts one of the biggest collections of animal torture porn of anyone in her world. Known as ‘Lillie’ and previously ‘Lizzy Mafiosa’ on Telegram, appears to have resumed activity after her release. Whatever disasters unfold behind closed doors, we know we bought her activity to public attention. We are of the belief she will not stop and will only escalate unless she is stopped by law enforcement.
She is not owed any understanding, simply put, her behaviour is indicative she belongs in a controlled environment.
I do this, because it is regretful that there is little to no academic input on this subject, and no resources to tap into to provide any kind of framework, reference or guidance to the few who are willing to engage in investigation. This is truly the path less travelled. We are seeing a phenomena unfold which is giving us insight into what evil unchecked looks like, and it is only growing. We have found ourselves trying to make sense of something that hitherto has been overlooked as something so obscure and unusual it has only ever been approached as a side note to a wider subject.
More importantly, we have found ourselves calling out for support to bring what we have discovered to a wider audience. This has been difficult to come by, simply put, most people don’t feel comfortable engaging with this subject at length. It is paradoxical that that we see such repulsion and upset on an individual level, yet we do not see this sentiment reflected on an institutional level. Were this not the case, Lee Chin Wee would not have walked free after mutilating and torturing countless monkeys to death in his bathroom. The desire to see these people held to account is there, but there is still a sense of law enforcement catching up.
This is perhaps understandable when no realistic training can be offered relating to zoosadism and dealing with it as a unique crime. No resources exist to achieve this end. We are limited to a handful of unpaid volunteers and individuals within law enforcement agencies who have taken up the challenge of seeing this overlooked criminal demographic does not elude justice.
Until we see change, we will continue to say their names. Whilst they may delight in the attention they receive today, or simply feel it won’t impact on them in any realistic way, I am holding hope that this will not always be the case. I understand these people well enough to know their behaviour and tone changes when the prospect of consequences begins to loom. I understand their capacity for shame and secrecy, that the braggadocio we see online wears rapidly thin when imprisonment becomes a realistic prospect.
Their cruelty in conjunction with their carelessness is quite possibly the best angle by which we can understand them, and it will also be their undoing.
Don’t miss out on your chance to join Arditi’s Telegram Channel!
